it shure as shiz takes more than a nationalist to take me down...
also, i don't agree with the term that the media has been using to describe this incident. in my opinion, the sad incident that occurred cant be labelled as a terrorist attack. even tho the term "terrorism" is fleeting and there is no set-in-stone definiton of the word out there, a single man, with no clear connections to terrorist groups, without coming with a clear political statement after the incident, cannot be labelled as a terrorist.
the norwegian society, due to the good life in general, tends to shove problems under the carpet. one of these problems is the political handling of immigration. breivik has troughout his youth years criticised the faulty immigration policy (used by the pol. party who had it's meeting on the island) that exist in norway. in his mind, the norwegian identity as a nation is slowly falling apart due to immigration and the evergrowing islam population in particular. this has been a problem in our neighbour country, sweden, during the recent years. labelling breivik as a "terrorist" is, due to the repelling nature of the term, like sticking ones head under the sand and ignoring the problem that is faulty immigration policy that continues to create tensions in the society.
breivik was no terrorist, nor was he a racist. if he would have been a racist, he would have shot muslims instead of norwegian youngsters. breivik is a crazed nationalist who is very dangerous and must be locked away for the rest of his life, but until the norwegians start discussing the difficult issues, there will come more incidents of this kind. now is the time to thank god that you don't live in norway